A. PÁEZ
SYNTHESE, 2009
In this paper I critically examine the notion of explanation used in artificial intelligence in general, and in the theory of belief revision in particular. I focus on two of the best known accounts in the literature: Pagnucco’s abductive expansion functions and Gärdenfors’ counterfactual analysis. I argue that both accounts are at odds with the way in which this notion has historically been understood in philosophy. They are also at odds with the explanatory strategies used in actual scientific practice. At the end of the paper I outline a set of desiderata for an epistemologically motivated, scientifically informed belief revision model for explanation.
Addrs. Cra. 1 E No. 19A - 40. Mario Laserna Building - School of Engineering, Bogotá, Colombia, Zip 111711, Ph. +(571) 332 4327, 332 4328, 332 4329
Universidad de los Andes | Monitored by Mineducación
Recognition as University: Decree 1297 of May 30th, 1964.
Recognition as legal entity: Resolution 28 of February 23, 1949 Minjusticia.
© Universidad de los Andes. All rights reserved.